LATEST COMPLETED WAR · Sep 28
A clearer view of output, participation, and consistency.
Clan totals show scale. Per-player averages show quality. Participation shows whether the roster is converting its capacity into war results.
Average war points
2,274
Median 2,500 · Flat vs prior 3
2400+ scorers
25
64.1% of participants
3-war under-2000
1
Current members below 2,000 in all 3 recorded wars
Active roster utilization
78.0%
39 of 50 slots · -7.3% vs prior 3
Clan war points
88,675
Three-war average 76,475 · -7.3%
All 16 decks used
34
87.2% of participants
Latest placement
#3
3-war average 3.3 · top 2 in 0/3
Roster strength
49/50
1 open slots · 49 members tracked
Latest-roster distribution
Where today’s 48 members landed in the latest completed war.
2400+25
2000–23997
1–19993
Zero/no record14
Three-war attendance
All 3 wars26
2 of 30
1 of 310
No records13
Capacity opportunity
What the latest scoring efficiency says about available upside.
154.2
war points per deck
49unused decks among active players
+7,556estimated points at current efficiency
123,36050 players × 16 decks at current efficiency
104,375best total in the 12-war view
Reliable core
All three wars recorded, 2,000+ each war, and at least 15 decks per war on average.
22
KaizerV3,017 avg
triss2,933 avg
erock872,833 avg
HANS2,833 avg
half2,800 avg
samoset2,717 avg
+16 more in the individual table
12-war performance trend
Total points summed from individual participant records.
Sep 2888,675
Sep 2168,750
Sep 1472,000
Sep 779,100
Aug 3181,475
Aug 2487,000
Aug 1793,425
Aug 1097,275
Aug 3101,700
Jul 27104,375
Biggest risers
Latest three-war average versus the prior three.
Dragon+17.5%
KaizerV+15.3%
erock87+13.3%
samoset+10.9%
HANS+9.7%
Needs a closer look
Largest downward changes with enough data on both sides.
OBags-30.9%
_Dimpu_-29.1%
half-15.6%
WorstNightMare-11.0%
koiknife-7.8%
Individual performance
Current roster ranked by average points across the latest three completed wars.
| KaizerVcoleader · #QUCL9P29J | 3,150 | 2,950 | 2,950 | 3,017 | 3/3 | 16.0 | +15.3% |
| trisselder · #YG2PUJY9 | 3,150 | 2,950 | 2,700 | 2,933 | 3/3 | 15.3 | -6.9% |
| erock87elder · #8YCQJPRR | 2,700 | 3,000 | 2,800 | 2,833 | 3/3 | 16.0 | +13.3% |
| HANSelder · #VJVR22G | 2,850 | 2,950 | 2,700 | 2,833 | 3/3 | 16.0 | +9.7% |
| G-MANmember · #8Q2UVVL2Q | 2,800 | — | — | 2,800 | 1/3 | 16.0 | — |
| halfcoleader · #VYR9V8UYP | 2,550 | 2,950 | 2,900 | 2,800 | 3/3 | 16.0 | -15.6% |
| mikeymember · #YYCQQUCYP | 2,800 | — | — | 2,800 | 1/3 | 16.0 | — |
| samosetleader · #CU928YCLQ | 2,600 | 2,650 | 2,900 | 2,717 | 3/3 | 16.0 | +10.9% |
| BigCountryelder · #8CCR2QCRU | 2,400 | 2,950 | 2,750 | 2,700 | 3/3 | 16.0 | Flat |
| Primrose_03elder · #VLPPV8U8L | 2,350 | 3,050 | 2,550 | 2,650 | 2/3 | 16.0 | -5.4% |
| koiknifeelder · #99LLGYU9 | 2,150 | 2,900 | 2,650 | 2,567 | 2/3 | 16.0 | -7.8% |
| schlitzcoleader · #2PGJ9R88C | 2,500 | 2,900 | 2,300 | 2,567 | 2/3 | 16.0 | +2.7% |
| Shooterelder · #QQQ2URGUQ | 2,900 | 2,200 | 2,600 | 2,567 | 2/3 | 16.0 | +8.5% |
| The Milkerelder · #2QR28VRL | 2,600 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,533 | 3/3 | 16.0 | -3.8% |
| whistling duckcoleader · #2CGP8YVG8 | 2,450 | 2,200 | 2,950 | 2,533 | 2/3 | 16.0 | -2.6% |
| dhambergmember · #CUPY2CCG | 2,500 | — | — | 2,500 | 1/3 | 16.0 | — |
| Girdanmember · #Y8RYRJUJ | 2,500 | — | — | 2,500 | 1/3 | 16.0 | — |
| Dragonelder · #YUR29RRC | 2,200 | 2,800 | 2,400 | 2,467 | 2/3 | 16.0 | +17.5% |
| Don Knotzelder · #99GJ00Y | 2,700 | 2,200 | 2,400 | 2,433 | 2/3 | 16.0 | Flat |
| WorstNightMareelder · #C2Q9CR2P9 | 2,600 | 2,300 | 2,400 | 2,433 | 2/3 | 16.0 | -11.0% |
| G_w_A_rmember · #9QP0LJQY | 2,400 | — | — | 2,400 | 1/3 | 16.0 | — |
| iQuFooLelder · #CUVL9CYP | 2,600 | 2,200 | 2,400 | 2,400 | 2/3 | 16.0 | +7.5% |
| La Conquistadorelder · #200LQY92LY | 2,500 | 2,200 | 2,500 | 2,400 | 2/3 | 16.0 | Flat |
| Howwieelder · #VRUU0PV9L | 2,500 | 2,200 | 2,400 | 2,367 | 2/3 | 16.0 | +7.6% |
| Nighthawkelder · #8GLJG998 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,100 | 2,367 | 2/3 | 16.0 | Flat |
| dragonX422elder · #90C89C9U | 2,250 | 2,400 | 2,150 | 2,267 | 1/3 | 16.0 | -4.2% |
| El Conquistadorcoleader · #9R8YR9R9P | 2,500 | 2,400 | 1,800 | 2,233 | 2/3 | 15.0 | +3.1% |
| Reaperelder · #9GQ8PGYP | 2,200 | 2,200 | 2,200 | 2,200 | 0/3 | 16.0 | -4.3% |
| seanfry007member · #YJY02R20 | 2,200 | — | — | 2,200 | 0/3 | 16.0 | — |
| Skinnymember · #JQYVYULR | 2,200 | — | — | 2,200 | 0/3 | 16.0 | — |
| OBagsmember · #UPP2YUU2C | 2,650 | 0 | 2,950 | 1,867 | 2/3 | 10.7 | -30.9% |
| Temustumember · #LPV2U99VQ | 1,800 | — | — | 1,800 | 0/3 | 16.0 | — |
| _Dimpu_member · #VRP88PQRP | 2,750 | 0 | 2,600 | 1,783 | 2/3 | 10.7 | -29.1% |
| Fer##member · #8RVVP99PC | 1,700 | 1,800 | 850 | 1,450 | 0/3 | 13.0 | — |
| fufufifimember · #UV0ULG028 | 600 | — | — | 600 | 0/3 | 4.0 | — |
| Hi Dadmember · #P282LQCYC | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0/3 | 0.0 | — |
| 323mazdamember · #UCG8UJ22G | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| fatherof5member · #80C92VUR | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| FatherOf5boysmember · #9YCVUGJPJ | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| Gentleman2369member · #8GVGU0000 | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| Giga223member · #P8QVG0Q2L | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| Lowkeymember · #C9GP22VGG | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| Michelmember · #CC02VLYUG | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| miffy ‘x’member · #PQY0P2RRY | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| Reths1member · #YJY02RG88 | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| RyCammember · #8CJVVYJP | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| Sgt. Danglesmember · #Y9QJPRR | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| THE BESTmember · #9GPPPVQCJ | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
| turtle_58member · #9R0LG08Q | — | — | — | — | 0/3 | — | — |
No players match these filters.
Performance by role
Three-war production and participation coverage grouped by current role.
| Leader | 1 | 2,717 | 16.0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Coleader | 5 | 2,630 | 15.8 | 80.0% | 100.0% |
| Elder | 17 | 2,527 | 16.0 | 70.6% | 100.0% |
| Member | 26 | 1,847 | 12.4 | 47.4% | 24.4% |
No roles match this filter.
War-by-war detail
Use this to separate score quality from simple roster turnout.
| Sep 28 | #3 | 88,675 | 2,274 | 2,500 | 39/50 | 78.0% | 25 | 7 | 34 | 154.2 | 23 |
| Sep 21 | #4 | 68,750 | 2,218 | 2,400 | 31/50 | 62.0% | 16 | 7 | 25 | 157.7 | 8 |
| Sep 14 | #3 | 72,000 | 2,323 | 2,500 | 31/50 | 62.0% | 21 | 5 | 25 | 158.2 | 8 |
| Sep 7 | #5 | 79,100 | 2,197 | 2,375 | 36/50 | 72.0% | 18 | 9 | 28 | 154.8 | 0 |
| Aug 31 | #5 | 81,475 | 2,328 | 2,500 | 35/50 | 70.0% | 19 | 5 | 26 | 162.0 | 7 |
| Aug 24 | #4 | 87,000 | 2,290 | 2,500 | 38/50 | 76.0% | 22 | 9 | 28 | 156.8 | 12 |
| Aug 17 | #5 | 93,425 | 2,173 | 2,400 | 43/50 | 86.0% | 26 | 10 | 33 | 157.8 | 7 |
| Aug 10 | #4 | 97,275 | 2,316 | 2,450 | 42/50 | 84.0% | 24 | 7 | 35 | 157.9 | 15 |
| Aug 3 | #4 | 101,700 | 2,260 | 2,500 | 45/50 | 90.0% | 28 | 10 | 32 | 163.0 | 0 |
| Jul 27 | #4 | 104,375 | 2,319 | 2,500 | 45/50 | 90.0% | 31 | 8 | 35 | 161.3 | 9 |
No wars match these filters.
How these numbers work
Definitions keep the dashboard useful and prevent misleading comparisons.
War points
The API field is named “fame”; the page calls it war points. Supercell now describes these as Medals earned from River Tasks. Wins and losses both contribute, so points reflect activity and results together.
50 active-player equivalent
Average points among players who used decks or earned points, multiplied by 50. It answers “what would this performance produce with 50 equally active players?” Actual clan output remains visible beside it.
Three-war under-2000
A current member must have a recorded participant row in all three latest wars and score below 2,000 each time. Missing history does not automatically place a new member on the list.
Active roster utilization
Players with recorded decks or points divided by a full 50-member roster. Zero-point historical rows are excluded from clan averages, but a current member’s recorded zero still appears in the individual table.
16 decks
Players recorded with at least 16 decks used—the full four decks across four Battle Days. This measures follow-through separately from points earned.
Trends
Clan trend badges compare the latest three-war average with the prior three. Player trends require at least two recorded wars in each period so one isolated result does not drive the signal.